Open an example to follow a full conversation. Scroll to the beginning of each conversation, and check the Pain-Tracks and the Cumulative Pain or Cumulative Pleasure analysis. Those tracks are the centre of the result.
Hot iron branding in the cheek in cattle
https://chatgpt.com/share/68d012c7-d508-8011-97f2-15a794c75eb3
Surgical castration in piglets
https://chatgpt.com/share/68d01462-9fd4-8011-aa47-a1a2fa7821f1
Ulcerated hock burns in chickens
https://chatgpt.com/share/68d01542-e8d4-8011-9474-e532a904d709
Asphyxia due to air exposure in salmon
https://chatgpt.com/share/68cfbe30-d100-8011-bbb9-48642f0e9ee1
How to read these examples
These are examples of Hedonic-Track analyses within the Welfare Footprint Framework. Anyone can put their own case into the Hedonic-Track tool and generate an analysis. The examples here are open case studies you can inspect.
Each example shows the step-by-step conversation. You provide or approve the information the system asks for, and you can challenge or refine it, until it produces a document with Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.
These documents are guidelines and starting points. They are for researchers, practitioners, and students who want to see how the framework can be applied, and they are meant to be refined by experts. They are not authoritative reports and they are not validated Welfare Footprint estimates.