We Measure the Evidence. You Make the Call. Here’s Why. We often receive feedback from people who share a common goal: improving animal welfare as much as possible. When feedback … Continue reading We Measure the Evidence. You Make the Call. Here’s Why.
The Scarcity of Trust in the Age of AI: Why Human Expertise Anchors the Welfare Footprint Wladimir J. Alonso In a recent analysis, Nate B. Jones, a sharp observer of … Continue reading The Scarcity of Trust in the Age of AI
The Gift of Clarity: making sense of animal welfare with the Welfare Footprint Framework Wladimir J Alonso, Cynthia Schuck-Paim As the year winds down, many of us find ourselves reflecting … Continue reading The Gift of Clarity: making sense of animal welfare with the Welfare Footprint Framework
What We Learned from Our Shrimp Welfare Research Position Selection Process As the Welfare Footprint Institute grows, we are slowly moving from being just scientists running projects to organizers of … Continue reading What we learnt from our recruiting process
A Milestone in Animal Welfare Science: The Welfare Footprint of the Egg and the ISAE 2025 Workshop On August 4th, 2025, during the 58th International Society for Applied Ethology (ISAE) … Continue reading The Welfare Footprint of the Egg
Unexpected Global Response to WFF Study on Trout Slaughter and Welfare Impact In just three weeks since its publication on 5 June 2025, our latest study in Scientific Reports has … Continue reading Unexpected Global Response to WFF Study on Trout Slaughter and Welfare Impact
How to Define Affective Experiences for Analysis: Striking the Right Level of Detail Cynthia Schuck-Paim & Wladimir Alonso The Welfare Footprint Framework (WFF) is designed to quantify the welfare impact … Continue reading Defining Affective Experiences
Confounding Factors in Welfare Comparisons of Animal Production Systems Wladimir J Alonso, Cynthia Schuck-Paim Controlled experiments—where variables are deliberately manipulated to establish cause-and-effect relationships—are the gold standard for drawing reliable … Continue reading Confounding Factors in Welfare Comparisons
Borrowing the Knowns and Unknowns Framework to Reveal Blind Spots in Animal Welfare Science Wladimir J Alonso, Cynthia Schuck-Paim There is always a risk of fixating on what we already … Continue reading Borrowing the Knowns and Unknowns Framework to Reveal Blind Spots in Animal Welfare Science
Using the Welfare Footprint Framework to Document Animal Welfare in Legal Settings The Welfare Footprint Framework (WFF) was originally developed to quantify and compare animal welfare impacts across different settings … Continue reading Using the Welfare Footprint Framework to document animal welfare in legal settings
Quantifying Animal Welfare: Our Scientific Director Discusses WFP’s Methodology on Hear This Idea Our Scientific Director, Cynthia, recently joined Fin Moorhouse on Episode 81 of the Hear This Idea podcast … Continue reading Our Scientific Director Discusses WFP’s Methodology on Hear This Idea
Bridging Neuroscience and Philosophy: Exploring Animal Emotions with the Neurophilosopher GPT Tool Wladimir J Alonso, Cynthia Schuck-Paim Understanding where emotions like love, happiness, pain, and suffering arise in the brain … Continue reading Bridging Neuroscience and Philosophy: Exploring Animal Emotions and Welfare with the Neurophilosopher GPT Tool
Opportunity: Consulting Work on Beef Cattle Welfare The Welfare Footprint Project is a scientific initiative aimed at quantifying animal welfare impacts using a meaningful, relatable, and comparable metric: time spent … Continue reading Consulting Opportunity: Beef Cattle Welfare Research
This article examines how AI, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), could soon enable tackling the enormous challenge of systematically quantifying the main sources of suffering across humans and animals.
Beyond Suffering: A Framework for Quantifying Positive Animal Welfare in Individuals and Populations Wladimir J Alonso, Cynthia Schuck-Paim Center for Welfare Metrics, Brazil Main Takeaways The Welfare Footprint Project has … Continue reading Quantifying Positive Animal Welfare in Individuals and Populations
Could Transparency International Be a Model to Improve Farm Animal Welfare? Cynthia Schuck-Paim, Wladimir J Alonso, In a recent article shared on the Effective Altruism Forum, we discuss a new … Continue reading Could Transparency International be a model for improved animal welfare?
Short agony or long ache: comparing sources of suffering that differ in duration and intensity Cynthia Schuck-Paim; Wladimir J. Alonso; Cian Hamilton Summary The Welfare Footprint framework quantifies the cumulative … Continue reading Short agony or long ache? Comparing intensity and duration of pain
IASP’s definition of pain is overly human-centric and fails to fully encompass its evolutionary, cognitive, and affective dimensions. It overlooks key aspects of this sensory phenomenon, such as its inherent consciousness, its independence from learning, and its evolutionary role extending beyond mere tissue injury. In an effort to address these shortcomings, we propose the following alternative definition
